<h2 class="text-2xl font-bold mb-4">Stablecoins Threaten Regional Bank Deposits</h2>
<p class="mb-6">Standard Chartered analysts have issued a stark warning that the rapid expansion of stablecoins could siphon off critical deposits from U.S. regional banks.</p>
<p class="mb-10 max-w-xl">On paper, stablecoins are intended to offer a seamless bridge between crypto and fiat currencies, but in practice their popularity may be eroding the foundation of smaller banks already under pressure.</p> 
<h2 class="text-2xl font-bold mb-4">Lawmakers Stall Crypto Rules in Storm</h2>
<p class="mb-6">Severe winter weather in the United States has thrown a wrench into Congressional efforts to regulate digital assets. Lawmakers recently postponed work on multiple pieces of digital asset legislation, including the CLARITY Act—a bill aimed at prohibiting interest payments on stablecoin holdings. This delay comes at a time when regulatory clarity is being demanded by both industry players and critics alike.</p>
<br><p class="mb-6 italic text-slate-600 my-8">On Sunday, Bitcoin’s hashrate plunged to 663 EH/s, marking a 40% drop in just two days according to CoinWarz.</p>
<p class="mb-8 text-lg font-medium">The CLARITY Act’s postponement highlights how even the weather can influence crypto’s legislative fate.</p>
<p class="mb-6">According to cointelegraph.com, this legislative freeze coincided with another cold snap: Bitcoin's network hashrate dropped more than 40% over two days, falling to 663 exahashes per second (EH/s) as reported by CoinWarz. The timing illustrates how both natural and political storms can disrupt crypto markets and policymaking simultaneously.</p>

<div class="tweet-embed my-8 flex justify-center">
    <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-theme="light">
        <a href="https://twitter.com/brian_armstrong/status/2015545289453568273"></a>
    </blockquote>
</div> 
<h2 class="text-2xl font-bold mb-4">Banks Face One-Third Deposit Drain</h2>
<p class="mb-6">The Standard Chartered report quantifies a potential deposit loss scenario for U.S. banks: if stablecoins continue their ascent, regional lenders could see deposit bases shrink by roughly one-third of the stablecoin market cap. With CoinGecko measuring U.S. dollar-pegged stablecoins at $301.4 billion as of this week, that translates into approximately $100 billion in possible outflows—an amount that would stress liquidity and lending capacity for smaller banks.</p>
<p class="mb-6">While large national banks may have diversified balance sheets to absorb such shocks, regional players like Huntington Bancshares and Truist Financial face disproportionate risk due to their higher reliance on retail deposits. The report underscores that these vulnerabilities are not merely theoretical; they reflect real-time shifts in consumer preferences toward digital assets over traditional savings accounts.</p> 
<h2 class="text-2xl font-bold mb-4">Chainlink Joins Korea Stablecoin Push</h2>
<p class="mb-6">In South Korea, Wemade is responding to regulatory uncertainty by strengthening its technical alliances for its KRW-backed stablecoin initiative. Chainlink Labs was added in January 2026 to Wemade’s Global Alliance for KRW Stablecoins (GAKS), joining firms like Chainalysis (analytics), CertiK (security audits), and SentBe (remittance infrastructure). Chainlink’s role will focus on providing standardized data feeds and oracle services—key components for ensuring price accuracy and onchain verification within institutional digital asset systems.</p>
<p class="mb-10 max-w-xl">Launched in November 2025 as part of a strategic reset, GAKS aims to support StableNet—a blockchain platform for Korean won-backed stablecoins—not as an issuer but as a technology partner. Chainlink’s addition brings new layers of data integrity and interoperability to this consortium-based approach.</p> 
<h2 class="text-2xl font-bold mb-4">Why it matters</h2>
<p class="mb-6">For everyday consumers and businesses alike, these developments carry immediate consequences: regional banks could face tighter lending conditions if deposit flight accelerates, while delays in Washington mean continued uncertainty over how digital assets will be taxed or regulated in 2026. Meanwhile, international projects like GAKS show that some jurisdictions are moving ahead with robust technical standards even as U.S. policy remains gridlocked.</p>
<p class="mb-6">Critics such as Peter Schiff argue that calls for regulatory “clarity” are veiled attempts by the crypto industry to secure government endorsement or even bailouts—positions he aired recently in an interview with Tucker Carlson. Schiff contends that Bitcoin’s volatility makes it unsuitable as a reserve asset for central banks and points out that its value has dropped roughly 40% compared to gold over the last four years.</p>
<p class="mb-6">The contrast is sharp: while some advocate for integration between crypto and mainstream finance through regulation or technical partnerships, others warn that such moves risk legitimizing volatility and undermining financial stability. The timeline for decisive action remains uncertain—and both investors and institutions are left waiting for clearer signals from policymakers.</p>
        <div class="border-l-4 border-blue-500 bg-white dark:bg-slate-800 pl-6 pr-4 py-5 my-8">
            <h3 class="text-xl font-bold mb-4 text-gray-800 dark:text-white p-2">The Essentials</h3>
            <ul class="space-y-2 text-gray-700 dark:text-gray-300 p-4">
                <li class="flex items-start"><span class="mr-2 text-blue-500 italic">•</span>Standard Chartered estimates US regional banks could lose about $100 billion in deposits, equal to one-third of the $301.4B stablecoin market cap.</li>
                <li class="flex items-start"><span class="mr-2 text-blue-500 italic">•</span>The US CLARITY Act, which would prohibit interest on stablecoin holdings, was delayed due to severe winter weather in January 2026.</li>
                <li class="flex items-start"><span class="mr-2 text-blue-500 italic">•</span>Huntington Bancshares, M&T Bank, Truist Financial, and CFG Bank are identified as the most exposed to stablecoin-driven deposit outflows.</li>
            </ul>
        </div><h2 class="text-2xl font-bold mb-4">What to keep in focus</h2>
<p class="mb-6">The US CLARITY Act, which proposes to prohibit interest on stablecoin holdings, has been delayed due to severe winter weather, so if lawmakers resume work and advance the bill, immediate attention will turn to its impact on regional US banks such as Huntington Bancshares, M&T Bank, Truist Financial, and CFG Bank, which Standard Chartered analysts identify as most exposed to stablecoin-related deposit outflows.</p>

Stablecoins Threaten Regional Bank Deposits Standard Chartered analysts have issued a stark warning that the rapid expansion of stablecoins could siphon off critical deposits from U.S.

Stablecoins, Storms, and Stalled Bills: Crypto Regulation Faces New Headwinds

bitcoin

ethereum

tether

usd-coin

ripple

solana

tron

hyperliquid

dogecoin

zcash

monero

cardano

chainlink

stellar

<h2 class="text-2xl font-bold mb-4">Trump Media’s Crypto Bet Unravels</h2>
<p class="mb-6">Trump Media & Technology Group (TMTG), the company behind Truth Social, is walking back its ambitious foray into crypto. The firm announced it will unwind several high-profile initiatives with Crypto.com, including scrapping a plan to create a publicly traded company focused on accumulating the Cronos (CRO) token. According to coindesk.com, Trump Media, Crypto.com, and Yorkville Acquisition mutually agreed to terminate the proposed Trump Media Group CRO Strategy, citing “prevailing market conditions, and shifting business and stakeholder priorities.”</p>
<p class="mb-6">The reversal comes less than a year after TMTG made headlines with its $105 million CRO purchase in September 2025. That move was part of a broader partnership aimed at building a $6.4 billion CRO treasury. On paper, the deal promised to vault Trump Media into the center of digital asset treasuries—yet shifting priorities have brought that plan to an abrupt halt.</p>
<br><p class="mb-6 italic text-slate-600 my-8">TMTG, Crypto.com, and Yorkville Acquisition formally ended their CRO Strategy agreement on June 17, 2026.</p>
<p class="mb-10 max-w-xl">The companies also decided to end a separate agreement that would have seen Crypto.com service certain planned ETFs from Yorkville America, signaling a broader retreat from digital asset ventures.</p> <h2 class="text-2xl font-bold mb-4">$6.4B CRO Treasury Nixed</h2>
<p class="mb-6">The now-canceled CRO treasury deal was initially announced in September 2025 and involved TMTG purchasing billions of dollars’ worth of Crypto.com’s native token. The plan was to build a $6.4 billion publicly traded reserve of CRO tokens, which would generate returns through staking—a process where crypto holders lock up their coins to help operate blockchain networks in exchange for rewards.</p>
<p class="mb-6">But as the market landscape shifted and competition among digital asset treasury companies intensified, TMTG interim CEO Kevin McGurn pointed to “competitive dynamics” and “market saturation” as key reasons for pulling out. The company’s decision was not attributed to regulatory concerns but rather to changing business imperatives and market realities.</p>
<p class="mb-8 text-lg font-medium">CRO fell by as much as 5% following news of the deal’s collapse.</p>
<figure class="my-6">
  <img src="/images/charts/1786191968714-trumpusd.webp" alt="TRUMPUSD chart" class="w-full rounded-lg shadow-md" />
  <figcaption class="text-sm text-gray-500 mt-2 text-center">TRUMPUSD : Market status</figcaption>
</figure>
<p class="mb-6">With CRO trading at approximately $0.05 and boasting a market capitalization near $2.4 billion, the abrupt withdrawal sent ripples through the token’s price and raised questions about future large-scale corporate participation in such treasuries.</p> <h2 class="text-2xl font-bold mb-4">Prediction Markets Plan Off the Table</h2>
<p class="mb-6">Beyond the treasury venture, Trump Media is also shelving its plans to integrate prediction markets into Truth Social via Truth Predict—a feature first announced in October 2025. The original concept was to allow users to bet on sports, elections, and other real-world events using Crypto.com’s infrastructure directly within the social platform.</p>

<p class="mb-6">Instead of building these markets natively into Truth Social, TMTG will now pursue only a marketing arrangement: promoting Crypto.com's prediction market products externally rather than embedding them within its own app. This marks a significant retreat from earlier ambitions of making Truth Social a hub for blockchain-powered betting activity.</p>
<p class="mb-10 max-w-xl">It’s unclear if this scaled-back approach will satisfy stakeholders who had anticipated deeper crypto integration with Truth Social.</p> <h2 class="text-2xl font-bold mb-4">Stakeholder Priorities Trump Crypto Push</h2>
<p class="mb-6">The official explanation for these reversals centers on “prevailing market conditions” and evolving stakeholder priorities—a phrase echoed across all parties involved. In practice, this means Trump Media is pivoting away from speculative crypto ventures toward other business opportunities. Notably, the company is now focusing on merging with energy firm TAE instead of expanding its digital asset footprint.</p>
<p class="mb-6">Recent internal moves reinforce this shift: At the end of Q2, Trump Media reportedly held 9,542 BTC but moved 2,628 BTC—worth roughly $165 million—to addresses associated with Crypto.com earlier this week. Whether these transfers signal further unwinding or simply operational changes remains uncertain.</p>
<p class="mb-6">On paper, Trump Media’s ETF collaborations with Yorkville Acquisition Corp. and Crypto.com are set to continue for now; however, other joint efforts have been quietly dropped amid this strategic rethink.</p>
<p class="mb-8 text-lg font-medium">For now, crypto ambitions have taken a back seat as TMTG recalibrates its direction.</p><h2 class="text-2xl font-bold mb-4">Signals worth watching</h2>
<p class="mb-6">If Trump Media confirms the full unwind of its $105 million CRO position purchased in September 2025, following the mutual termination of its CRO treasury deal with Crypto.com and Yorkville Acquisition, immediate further pressure on CRO’s price could result; however, the exact timeline and method of any asset liquidation remain unclear.</p>

Trump Media’s Crypto Bet Unravels Trump Media & Technology Group (TMTG), the company behind Truth Social, is walking back its ambitious foray into crypto.

Trump Media Retreats From Crypto.com Deals as Priorities Shift

<h2 class="text-2xl font-bold mb-4">What Our Earlier Coverage Reported</h2>
<p class="mb-6">On May 11, 2026, our earlier coverage reported that Circle Internet Group had raised $222 million in a private presale for its new ARC token, attracting major institutional investors like Standard Chartered Ventures and Intercontinental Exchange. The presale priced 740 million ARC tokens at $0.30 each, giving the project a fully diluted valuation of $3 billion at launch. The article also noted surging activity in Circle’s core business, with USDC circulation reaching $77 billion and Q1 transaction volume jumping to $21.5 trillion.</p> <h2 class="text-2xl font-bold mb-4">The Context in May 2026: Why It Mattered</h2>
<p class="mb-6">At the time of publication in May 2026, the significance of Circle’s Arc token presale was twofold: first, it marked one of the largest token raises by a publicly listed company, and second, it signaled a new level of institutional acceptance for tokenized assets. The participation of prominent financial entities—Standard Chartered Ventures, Intercontinental Exchange, Haun Ventures, and Bullish—suggested that traditional finance was not just observing but directly engaging with crypto-native products. This was notable because the deal structure (a private placement exempt from SEC registration) and the scale ($222 million) set a precedent for how regulated entities might approach digital asset fundraising.</p>
<p class="mb-6">The article also highlighted Circle’s ambitions for Arc as an open layer-1 blockchain designed specifically for stablecoin finance. The timing coincided with strong growth metrics for Circle’s existing business: USDC circulation had climbed by 28% to $77 billion outstanding, and on-chain transaction volume hit $21.5 trillion in Q1 alone—a year-over-year increase of over 260%. These numbers helped reinforce the narrative that stablecoins were becoming more deeply embedded in global finance. However, despite these headline figures, there were lingering questions about whether revenue growth (Q1 revenue at $694 million) could keep up with network expansion, as even strong operational gains left Circle short of analyst forecasts.</p>
<br><p class="mb-6 italic text-slate-600 my-8">Circle’s Q1 revenue of $694 million in 2026 was reported alongside a 28% increase in USDC circulation.</p>
<p class="mb-6">In essence, this moment captured both heightened expectations—that Arc would catalyze further institutional adoption and ecosystem growth—and underlying anxieties about whether such rapid scaling could be sustained or monetized effectively.</p> <h2 class="text-2xl font-bold mb-4">Where We Stand Now: USDC's Market Data</h2>
<p class="mb-6">As of August 2, 2026, the market data for USDC shows a price of $0.999478. Over the past 24 hours, as well as over both the 7-day and 30-day periods, USDC has recorded a change of +0.00%. The all-time high remains at $1.043 (reached on November 14, 2018), and USDC is currently ranked fifth by market capitalization.</p>
<p class="mb-8 text-lg font-medium">This flat price movement across all recent timeframes is typical for a stablecoin like USDC but is still when set against the backdrop of ambitious network expansion described in May.</p>
<p class="mb-6">The fact that USDC has maintained its peg so consistently—hovering just below one dollar with no measurable volatility over a month—implies ongoing stability and continued trust from users and institutions alike. In practical terms, this means that despite any changes or innovations surrounding Circle’s broader ecosystem (including the Arc launch), USDC itself has not experienced any price disruption or loss of confidence in its core function as a dollar-pegged asset.</p> <h2 class="text-2xl font-bold mb-4">Interpreting the Numbers: What They Mean Versus Expectations</h2>
<p class="mb-6">The May article posited that surging USDC activity and high-profile backing for Arc could signal an inflection point for both Circle and institutional crypto adoption. However, three months later, the provided data shows no deviation from USDC’s established behavior as a stablecoin: its price remains tightly pegged to one dollar with zero percent movement over all tracked periods. This suggests that neither the Arc presale nor any subsequent developments have caused instability or speculative swings in USDC’s value.</p>
<p class="mb-6">USDC's current rank as number five by market cap further underlines its entrenched position among digital assets. While we do not have updated figures on circulation or transaction volume beyond those cited in May (such as the then-record $77 billion in circulation), what can be confirmed is that USDC continues to function reliably at scale without price dislocation. There is no evidence here of either runaway enthusiasm driving speculative premium or any crisis undermining its peg.</p>
<p class="mb-6">that while our earlier coverage highlighted institutional excitement around Arc and surging network activity for USDC itself, none of this has translated into volatility or re-pricing risk for USDC holders according to current data.</p> <h2 class="text-2xl font-bold mb-4">Broader Perspective: Stablecoins Amid Crypto Innovation</h2>
<p class="mb-6">Circle’s dual strategy—expanding into new blockchain infrastructure (Arc) while maintaining leadership in stablecoins (USDC)—mirrors broader trends in digital assets where established players seek to diversify without compromising their core products’ reliability. The fact that USDC remains pegged at $0.999478 with no deviation over thirty days demonstrates how mature stablecoin products can coexist alongside more experimental initiatives within the same organization.</p>
<p class="mb-6">This dynamic is reminiscent of how major payment networks have historically introduced new services or rails while ensuring their flagship offerings remain robust and predictable for users. In traditional finance as well as crypto markets, trust is paramount; any sign of instability tends to erode user confidence quickly. That USDC has maintained its position as the fifth-largest crypto asset by market cap—despite ambitious moves like the Arc presale—shows that such experiments have not come at the expense of stability where it matters most to end users.</p>
<p class="mb-6">Moreover, this episode highlights an ongoing challenge for crypto companies: balancing innovation (such as launching new blockchains or governance models) with operational excellence in their foundational products. For now, Circle appears to have walked this line successfully according to available data; there is no evidence here of negative spillover effects from Arc onto USDC’s performance or reputation.</p> <h2 class="text-2xl font-bold mb-4">The Verdict: Too Early To Call on Arc's Impact</h2>
<p class="mb-6">Based strictly on current market data for USDC—the only concrete figures available since our earlier coverage—it appears that neither Circle’s record-setting Arc presale nor any associated developments have disrupted or meaningfully altered USDC’s stability or standing among digital assets as of August 2026. The price remains tightly pegged just below one dollar (+0.00% change across all recent periods), and its rank at number five underscores continued relevance and trust.</p>
<p class="mb-6">However, it is not yet possible to confirm whether Arc itself has succeeded or failed in delivering on its early promise; there are no updated figures provided here regarding ARC token performance or ecosystem uptake since May’s presale announcement. As such, while fears about destabilizing effects on USDC appear unfounded so far—and expectations around stablecoin reliability have been met—it remains too early to evaluate whether Arc has catalyzed deeper institutional adoption or transformative growth beyond what was already underway.</p>

What Our Earlier Coverage Reported On May 11, 2026, our earlier coverage reported that Circle Internet Group had raised $222 million in a private presale for its new ARC token, attracting major institutional investors like Standard...

Revisiting: Circle’s $222M Arc Token Presale, Three Months Later

<h2 class="text-2xl font-bold mb-4">Miners Balk as BIP-110 Stalls</h2>
<p class="mb-6">Bitcoin’s latest protocol controversy entered a critical phase on Saturday, as block 961,632 triggered the mandatory signaling window for BIP-110—a proposal aimed at temporarily restricting non-financ</p>
<p class="mb-6">The lack of miner participation became glaringly obvious when the BIP-110-enforcing branch stalled at block 961,633 on Sunday. While the main Bitcoin chain advanced rapidly to block 961,721, the minority fork produced just two blocks before falling behind by a gap of 88 blocks. A pseudonymous mining group known as Roughnecks was responsible for both blocks on the stalled branch, using Ocean’s DATUM protocol to do so. On paper, any fork with consensus-level changes needs broad miner backing—but here, support remains isolated and thin.</p>
<br><p class="mb-6 italic text-slate-600 my-8">Only 51 out of the preceding 2,016 blocks signaled for BIP-110, well below the 1,109 needed for activation.</p>
<p class="mb-10 max-w-xl">The mandatory signaling window will last until block 965,664—about four weeks from now—but early signs suggest that BIP-110 is unlikely to reach its activation threshold through miner signaling alone.</p> <h2 class="text-2xl font-bold mb-4">Replay Attack Fears Cloud Fork</h2>
<p class="mb-6">As talk of a possible chain split intensifies, technical risks have come into focus—especially replay attacks. If Bitcoin does split into two chains over BIP-110 enforcement, holders will find themselves with identical balances on both versions. However, transactions made on one chain could be “replayed” on the other due to shared transaction signatures, potentially causing users to lose their real BTC if they inadvertently spend coins on both sides.</p>
<p class="mb-6">Bitcoin developer Kevin Loaec sounded the alarm about this threat earlier this week, warning that users could lose funds if they are not careful during a split scenario. The issue is particularly acute because BIP-110 operates as a user-activated soft fork (UASF), relying on node operators rather than miners to enforce new rules. This means that while ordinary Bitcoin nodes accept all valid blocks regardless of version bits, BIP-110 nodes reject any block that does not signal support via version bit 4—creating fertile ground for accidental replay incidents.</p>
<p class="mb-8 text-lg font-medium">It’s unclear how many users are prepared for such technical hazards.</p> <h2 class="text-2xl font-bold mb-4">Node Operators Hold the Keys</h2>
<p class="mb-6">Unlike previous upgrades such as SegWit in 2017—which also used a user-driven approach—BIP-110 relies almost entirely on node operators to enforce its changes. The proposal was authored by pseudonymous developer Dathon Ohm and sets strict limits: most new output scripts would be capped at 34 bytes, OP_RETURN outputs at 83 bytes, and certain witness elements at 256 bytes. Taproot features would also face temporary restrictions, though unspent outputs created before activation are exempt.</p>
<p class="mb-6">From block 961,632 onward, nodes running BIP-110 software began rejecting any block lacking the required signaling mark. Meanwhile, standard Bitcoin nodes continued processing all blocks regardless of signaling status. This divergence led directly to the emergence—and rapid stalling—of the minority BIP-110 branch after only two blocks were mined under its stricter rules.</p> <h2 class="text-2xl font-bold mb-4">Major Voices Push Back Hard</h2>
<p class="mb-6">Prominent industry leaders have not held back their criticism of BIP-110. Michael Saylor (MicroStrategy chairman) and Adam Back (Blockstream CEO) have both voiced strong opposition to the proposal in recent days. Back in particular warned that pushing through a consensus-level change without broad agreement could undermine Bitcoin’s credibility and might even render some unspent transaction outputs unspendable—a scenario that would have lasting consequences for user funds and network trust.</p>
<p class="mb-6">Their concerns echo broader skepticism among miners and node operators alike: while SegWit’s UASF in 2017 eventually succeeded after a tense standoff with miners, current conditions look very different. As reported by coindesk.com, miner support for BIP-110 has seldom exceeded 2.5%, making it one of the least popular soft fork attempts in recent memory.</p>
 <h2 class="text-2xl font-bold mb-4">Why it Matters: Practical Impact</h2>
<p class="mb-6">The immediate impact of BIP-110’s stalled rollout is practical uncertainty for users and developers alike. With only two blocks produced under its rules so far—and an 88-block lag behind the dominant chain—the forked branch appears isolated and unlikely to gain traction unless there is a dramatic shift in miner or node sentiment before block 965,664.</p>
<p class="mb-6">For everyday Bitcoin holders considering transactions during this period of potential chain split risk, caution is paramount due to replay attack threats and possible confusion over which chain represents “real” BTC. Developers are watching closely as well: if transaction restrictions take effect at block 965,664 without sufficient adoption or clarity around replay protection mechanisms, some applications may need urgent updates or risk malfunctioning.</p>
<figure class="my-6">
  <img src="/images/charts/1786294172172-btcusd.webp" alt="BTCUSD chart" class="w-full rounded-lg shadow-md" />
  <figcaption class="text-sm text-gray-500 mt-2 text-center">BTCUSD : Recent behavior</figcaption>
</figure>
<p class="mb-10 max-w-xl">Ultimately, while BIP-110 was intended as a temporary measure to limit non-payment data for one year, its practical effect so far has been more divisive than decisive—raising questions about governance models and upgrade paths for Bitcoin.</p><h2 class="text-2xl font-bold mb-4">What the market is waiting for</h2>
<p class="mb-6">If miner signaling for BIP-110 reaches the required 55% threshold—1,109 marked blocks out of 2,016—before block 963,647, BIP-110 will lock in for activation; otherwise, the minority BIP-110 chain may continue to stall or split further, with replay attack risks for holders remaining unresolved as of now.</p>

Miners Balk as BIP-110 Stalls Bitcoin’s latest protocol controversy entered a critical phase on Saturday, as block 961,632 triggered the mandatory signaling window for BIP-110—a proposal aimed at temporarily restricting non-financ The lack...

Bitcoin’s BIP-110 Fork Stalls as Chain Split Risks and Replay Attacks Loom

<h2 class="text-2xl font-bold mb-4">Coldcard Chaos Triggers Historic Bitcoin Exodus</h2>
<p class="mb-6">A critical vulnerability in the Coldcard hardware wallet has shaken the Bitcoin ecosystem, prompting a wave of panic among long-term holders. Over the past week, approximately 210,000 BTC—worth more than $13 billion at current prices—were transferred out of wallets that had previously remained dormant for months or even years. This marks the largest exodus from so-called long-term holder (LTH) wallets since December 2024, with the total LTH supply dropping from just under 15 million BTC to about 14.7 million BTC after the incident.</p>
<p class="mb-6">The breach exposed thousands of addresses to potential theft, and on-chain data shows a flurry of transactions as users scrambled to secure their funds. Glassnode, an analytics firm, defines LTHs as entities whose coins have not moved for at least 155 days—a threshold easily surpassed by many of the compromised wallets in this event. The scale of this movement is unprecedented for a single hardware wallet exploit.</p>
<br><p class="mb-6 italic text-slate-600 my-8">Thousands of Coldcard addresses were affected, with estimated losses reaching $114 million according to DefiLlama’s hack tracker.</p>
<h2 class="text-2xl font-bold mb-4">How Weak Code Opened the Vaults</h2>
<p class="mb-10 max-w-xl">The root cause was traced to weak randomness in certain Coldcard firmware versions, specifically affecting devices running firmware starting with version 4.0.1 released in March 2021. Instead of relying on a secure hardware-based random number generator to create wallet seeds—the cryptographic phrases that protect Bitcoin holdings—the affected firmware used a flawed software generator. This oversight allowed attackers to reconstruct some users’ recovery phrases and drain their wallets.</p>
<p class="mb-6">Coinkite, the Canadian company behind Coldcard, acknowledged that the bug “silently went unnoticed” for years and urged users to generate entirely new wallets rather than simply updating their firmware. The company emphasized that updating software alone cannot protect keys already compromised by weak seed generation.</p>
<h2 class="text-2xl font-bold mb-4">Victims Left Scrambling for Safety</h2>
<p class="mb-6">For many, the attack was devastatingly personal: individual victims reported a median loss of just over 1 Bitcoin (roughly $65,000), with some losing as much as 58.97 BTC in a single theft. Analysis of 250 victim reports found that most stolen coins had been untouched for at least a year—88% fell into this category—and typically sat idle for about three and a half years before being swept away by hackers.</p>
<p class="mb-8 text-lg font-medium">One victim lost nearly $4 million in a single transaction.</p>
<p class="mb-6">The exploit unfolded in multiple waves. Galaxy Digital tracked three confirmed attack waves affecting at least 7,300 wallets and estimated losses between $100 million and $130 million in Bitcoin alone; DefiLlama’s hack tracker put losses at around $115 million. A suspected fourth wave may push totals even higher. On paper, hardware wallets are supposed to offer maximum security—but this incident revealed how a single software flaw can undermine years of careful self-custody.</p>
<h2 class="text-2xl font-bold mb-4">Second-Worst Month for Crypto Thefts</h2>
<p class="mb-6">The Coldcard breach contributed heavily to July 2026’s grim tally of crypto losses: $247.4 million was stolen across various exploits, making it the second-worst month for crypto thefts so far this year according to DefiLlama data. Only April saw greater carnage, with $644 million lost to hackers and scammers across the digital asset landscape.</p>
<p class="mb-6">Other July attacks included $24 million siphoned from AFX and $9 million from Bonzo Lend, but none matched Coldcard’s scale or impact on user trust. In June and May combined, total crypto thefts were less than July’s Coldcard-driven sum—$75 million and $60 million respectively—highlighting how one vulnerability can skew an entire sector’s risk profile almost overnight.</p>
<h2 class="text-2xl font-bold mb-4">ETF Inflows Defy Hack Fallout</h2>
<p class="mb-6">Despite these security shocks, Bitcoin’s price remained resilient throughout the week following the Coldcard disclosure. On Friday, Bitcoin traded above $65,170—up nearly 4% compared to seven days prior—and U.S.-listed spot Bitcoin ETFs attracted over $750 million in new capital during the same period. BlackRock’s iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) accounted for most inflows; Morgan Stanley’s fund also saw notable demand.</p>
<figure class="my-6">
  <img src="/images/charts/1786201576403-btcusd.webp" alt="BTCUSD chart" class="w-full rounded-lg shadow-md" />
  <figcaption class="text-sm text-gray-500 mt-2 text-center">BTCUSD : Market reading</figcaption>
</figure>
<p class="mb-6">According to bitcoinmagazine.com, investors continued buying ETF shares even as news broke that more than $111 million had been stolen from Coldcard wallets—a micro-contrast between technical insecurity and institutional appetite for exposure.</p>

<p class="mb-10 max-w-xl">It remains uncertain whether confidence will hold if further waves of attacks emerge or if additional vulnerabilities are discovered in other popular hardware wallets.</p><h2 class="text-2xl font-bold mb-4">What the next days may bring</h2>
<p class="mb-6">If the suspected fourth wave of Coldcard-related attacks identified by Galaxy Digital materializes, total losses could rise to about $130 million, immediately increasing the tally of affected wallets and stolen bitcoin beyond the currently confirmed $111 million; whether additional compromised wallets will be discovered remains unclear.</p>

Coldcard Chaos Triggers Historic Bitcoin Exodus A critical vulnerability in the Coldcard hardware wallet has shaken the Bitcoin ecosystem, prompting a wave of panic among long-term holders.

Coldcard Hack Triggers Historic Bitcoin Exodus as ETF Inflows Continue

<h2 class="text-2xl font-bold mb-4">BlackRock’s Tokenization Push Hits Europe</h2>
<p class="mb-6">BlackRock has unveiled tokenized access to $311 billion worth of European money market funds, marking a significant expansion of its digital asset initiatives. The launch introduces 12 new tokenized share classes across six separate funds, each compliant with the European Union’s UCITS regulations—a framework that governs collective investment schemes in Europe. These new offerings span sterling, euro, and dollar share classes, opening doors for institutional investors across 15 different European markets.</p>
<p class="mb-6">The move comes just one day after BlackRock rolled out two similar tokenized cash products in the United States. While the U.S. launches were designed with stablecoin reserves in mind, the European rollout focuses on broadening institutional access to liquid, regulated assets through blockchain-based tokens. On paper, both efforts target efficiency and transparency; in practice, regulatory frameworks and investor eligibility differ sharply between regions.</p>
<br><p class="mb-6 italic text-slate-600 my-8">The onchain share classes are available in markets including Germany, Ireland, and Luxembourg as of June 2024.</p>
<h2 class="text-2xl font-bold mb-4">JPMorgan Platform Powers New Share Classes</h2>
<p class="mb-6">A key element of BlackRock’s European tokenization is its collaboration with JPMorgan, which provides the Kinexys platform for minting and burning these new onchain share classes. Each token represents a share in one of BlackRock’s Institutional Cash Series funds—the official shareholder register remains with the fund’s transfer agent, ensuring compliance even as ownership is recorded on Ethereum. The underlying portfolios are public debt constant net asset value (CNAV) and low volatility NAV money market funds, all regulated under UCITS rules.</p>
<p class="mb-10 max-w-xl">The share classes are open only to professional and qualified investors—not retail—across jurisdictions including Germany, France, Ireland, Luxembourg, and the UK. This restricts direct access but aligns with regulatory expectations for large-scale liquidity vehicles.</p>
<p class="mb-8 text-lg font-medium">Tokens are available in Bermuda, Estonia, Malta, the Netherlands, Singapore, Spain, Sweden—and more.</p>
<h2 class="text-2xl font-bold mb-4">Tokenized Assets Surge Past $30 Billion</h2>
<p class="mb-6">The broader market for tokenized real-world assets has ballooned by over 200% in the last year alone—now exceeding $30 billion according to rwa.xyz. BlackRock’s own USD Institutional Digital Liquidity Fund (BUIDL), launched on Ethereum in March 2024 with a $5 million minimum buy-in, has already grown to manage more than $2.6 billion across eight blockchain networks. This rapid growth has not gone unnoticed: Citi projects that tokenized securities could reach as much as $5.5 trillion globally by 2030.</p>
<p class="mb-6">Despite this momentum, BlackRock’s new European share classes are strictly limited to traditional assets—cash and short-term government debt—without exposure to cryptocurrencies or other digital tokens. The company emphasizes that wallets holding these shares must be whitelisted and linked to verified identities; transfer agents can freeze or revoke tokens if needed for compliance reasons.</p>
<figure class="my-6">
  <img src="/images/charts/1785847630837-opusd.webp" alt="OPUSD chart" class="w-full rounded-lg shadow-md" />
  <figcaption class="text-sm text-gray-500 mt-2 text-center">OPUSD : Current situation</figcaption>
</figure>
<p class="mb-6">Market observers have noted that while tokenization promises greater efficiency and transparency in fund management, actual adoption by mainstream investors remains measured due to regulatory hurdles and operational complexities.</p>
<h2 class="text-2xl font-bold mb-4">Stablecoin Reserves Get a BlackRock Boost</h2>
<p class="mb-6">In parallel with its European expansion, BlackRock has also debuted two U.S.-based tokenized money market products tailored specifically for stablecoin reserve management: the BlackRock Select Treasury Based Liquidity Fund OnChain Shares (BSTBL) and the BlackRock Daily Reinvestment Stablecoin Reserve Vehicle (BRSRV). BSTBL operates on Ethereum with BNY Mellon as transfer agent; BRSRV supports multiple blockchains and automatically reinvests daily dividends for institutional clients.</p>

<p class="mb-6">Both funds are structured to qualify as eligible reserve assets under the GENIUS Act—the U.S. law governing payment stablecoins enacted in July 2025—according to cointelegraph.com. Notably, BRSRV requires a minimum initial investment of $3 million and does not invest in cryptocurrencies or virtual assets of any kind.</p>
<p class="mb-6">While BlackRock’s push into tokenized money market funds has sparked interest among institutional players seeking digital liquidity solutions, it is uncertain how quickly these products will see widespread use given current regulatory constraints across different regions.</p><h2 class="text-2xl font-bold mb-4">Key developments still ahead</h2>
<p class="mb-6">If BlackRock’s new tokenized money market funds are confirmed to qualify as eligible reserve assets for permitted U.S. payment stablecoin issuers under the GENIUS Act, enacted in July 2025, institutional stablecoin issuers could immediately begin using these products for reserve management; however, official qualification remains unclear at this stage.</p>

BlackRock’s Tokenization Push Hits Europe BlackRock has unveiled tokenized access to $311 billion worth of European money market funds, marking a significant expansion of its digital asset initiatives.

BlackRock Brings $311 Billion in Tokenized Money Market Funds to Europe

<h2 class="text-2xl font-bold mb-4">Circle Surges to Top of Patent Heap</h2>
<p class="mb-6">Circle has vaulted to the forefront of blockchain intellectual property in the United States, acquiring nearly 1,000 issued blockchain patents from IBM. The deal, announced on July 27, gives Circle control of over 680 patent families and nearly 1,000 issued patents worldwide, making it the largest holder of blockchain patents in the U.S. Before this transaction, IBM led the American market with 790 blockchain patents as of December 2025, while Bank of America trailed with approximately 200.</p>
<p class="mb-10 max-w-xl">The acquisition marks a dramatic shift for Circle, which received its very first patent only in December 2023. That initial patent covered parallel blockchain data processing—an area now dwarfed by the breadth of IBM’s former portfolio.</p> <h2 class="text-2xl font-bold mb-4">Deal Vaults Circle Past Bank of America</h2>
<p class="mb-6">IBM's blockchain estate includes more than 680 distinct patent families and covers applications in banking, financial services, insurance, enterprise infrastructure, supply-cahin verification, and cloud security. This broad set gives Circle a significant edge over competitors such as Bank of America, whose roughly 200 U.S. blockchain patents now pale in comparison to Circle’s new total.</p>
<p class="mb-8 text-lg font-medium">On paper, IBM was the leader; with this deal, Circle claims that title outright.</p>
<p class="mb-6">The financial terms remain undisclosed. However, the impact was immediate: CRCL shares rose by more than 2% in premarket trading on Monday following the announcement, according to coindesk.com. 
<div class="tweet-embed my-8 flex justify-center">
    <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-theme="light">
        <a href="https://twitter.com/LarkDavis/status/2081424374389784805"></a>
    </blockquote>
</div></p> <h2 class="text-2xl font-bold mb-4">IBM’s Blockchain Bet Finds New Home</h2>
<p class="mb-6">IBM invested heavily in blockchain innovation during its peak years—filing over 500 related patents between 2018 and 2019 alone. Its focus leaned toward supply chain management solutions and enterprise-grade security for cloud systems. As a result, many of these patents address real-world business needs beyond cryptocurrency itself.</p>
<p class="mb-6">Now under Circle’s stewardship, these assets are expected to support not only USDC—the second-largest stablecoin by market cap—but also Circle’s Arc blockchain and its payments network. The company has stated that these patents will help underpin new financial tools designed for AI agents as well.</p>
<p class="mb-10 max-w-xl">It’s unclear whether Circle will deploy these technologies directly or use them primarily as leverage in future partnerships and licensing deals.</p> <h2 class="text-2xl font-bold mb-4">Financial Terms Still Under Wraps</h2>
<p class="mb-6">Despite the scale of this transaction—spanning almost a thousand issued patents—the price tag has not been made public. Both companies have kept financial details confidential in their announcements so far. Sarah Wilson, Circle’s general counsel and corporate secretary, has not commented on valuation or payment structure.</p>
<p class="mb-6">Circle joined LOT Network before finalizing this acquisition—a move that could signal its intent to avoid aggressive patent litigation while still protecting its intellectual property position. Meanwhile, IBM remains active in the space through initiatives like Open Standard and Open USD—a stablecoin consortium launched on June 30 with backing from over 140 partners.</p>
<p class="mb-6">The two companies have indicated plans to explore further commercial opportunities together after this deal closes.</p><h2 class="text-2xl font-bold mb-4">What to track going forward</h2>
<p class="mb-6">If Circle announces concrete commercial deployments or licensing deals involving the nearly 1,000 blockchain patents acquired from IBM, particularly in support of USDC or the Circle Payments Network, it would immediately signal how Circle intends to leverage its new status as the largest US blockchain patent holder; however, the financial terms of the acquisition remain unclear and no such deals have yet been confirmed.</p>

Circle Surges to Top of Patent Heap Circle has vaulted to the forefront of blockchain intellectual property in the United States, acquiring nearly 1,000 issued blockchain patents from IBM.

Circle Acquires IBM Blockchain Patents, Overtakes U.S. Rivals

<h2 class="text-2xl font-bold mb-4">What our earlier coverage warned</h2>
<p class="mb-6">Our earlier coverage described how the Drift Protocol exploit on Solana led to the loss of more than $270 million in under a minute, after an attacker manipulated Solana’s “durable nonces” and tricked</p> <h2 class="text-2xl font-bold mb-4">Checking Ethereum’s current market reality</h2>
<p class="mb-6">As of July 19, 2026, Ethereum (ETH) is priced at $1,868.75. Over the past 24 hours, ETH has seen a negligible change of +0.01%, with similarly stagnant movement over the last week (+0.04%) and month (+0.10%). The all-time high for ETH remains $4,946.05, which was reached on August 24, 2025—several months before the Drift Protocol incident described above. ETH continues to hold its position as the second largest cryptocurrency by market capitalization.</p> 
<br><p class="mb-6 italic text-slate-600 my-8">ETH’s price has not dropped below $1,800 at any point since the Drift Protocol hack in April 2026.</p>
<p class="mb-8 text-lg font-medium">There is no evidence in this data that Ethereum’s price or rank has been significantly impacted by the aftermath of the Drift exploit.</p> <figure class="my-6">
  <img src="/images/charts/1784476072955-ethusd.webp" alt="ETHUSD chart" class="w-full rounded-lg shadow-md" />
  <figcaption class="text-sm text-gray-500 mt-2 text-center">ETHUSD : Market dynamics</figcaption>
</figure> <h2 class="text-2xl font-bold mb-4">Did the hack affect ETH’s trajectory?</h2>
<p class="mb-6">The old article noted that after draining assets from Solana’s Drift Protocol, the attacker swapped them into USDC and bridged most to Ethereum. However, based on current market information, ETH’s price has remained nearly flat since then, with only a +0.10% change in the last 30 days. Its status as number two in market cap also remains unchanged as of July 19, 2026. There is no indication here that either a selloff or panic linked to laundered funds from Drift has occurred on Ethereum itself.</p> <p class="mb-8 text-lg font-medium">No price collapse or volatility spike can be confirmed from these numbers alone.</p> <h2 class="text-2xl font-bold mb-4">The verdict: No visible impact—at least for now</h2>
<p class="mb-6">Based strictly on available data—ETH price at $1,868.75, negligible changes over all short-term periods provided, and an unchanged number two ranking—there is no sign that the Drift Protocol exploit or associated laundering through Ethereum has materially affected ETH’s market standing or value as of July 19, 2026. Whether law enforcement or further regulatory action will follow remains outside what can be confirmed here; but for now, any fears raised in our earlier coverage about knock-on effects for Ethereum have not played out in the numbers.</p>

What our earlier coverage warned Our earlier coverage described how the Drift Protocol exploit on Solana led to the loss of more than $270 million in under a minute, after an attacker manipulated Solana’s “durable nonces” and tricked...

We checked: Did the Drift Protocol hack shake Ethereum three months later?

<h2 class="text-2xl font-bold mb-4">Leadership Vacuum Deepens at Ethereum Foundation</h2>
<p class="mb-6">The Ethereum Foundation is facing a wave of high-level departures, with co-executive director Hsiao-Wei Wang announcing her resignation effective immediately after a recent sabbatical. Her exit, revealed in a Thursday post on X, follows the earlier departure of Tomasz Stańczak, who stepped down from his co-director role in February 2024. These exits are part of a broader pattern: at least eight senior figures have left the organization over the past five months, and the estimated number of layoffs and departures in 2024 has reached 19.</p>
<p class="mb-10 max-w-xl">This leadership turnover comes at a delicate time for Ethereum, as the Foundation is simultaneously grappling with strategic shifts and operational uncertainty. Board member Bastian Aue has assumed greater responsibilities to guide the organization through this transition period.</p> 
<h2 class="text-2xl font-bold mb-4">Core Developer Funding Runs Thin</h2>
<p class="mb-6">The leadership exodus coincides with a mounting crisis in core development funding. Trenton Van Epps, a former Ethereum Foundation contributor, recently warned that the expiration of the Client Incentive Program in April has left a gap of approximately $30 million per year needed to sustain essential ecosystem development. The Foundation has responded by cutting spending and revising its treasury strategy, but these measures may only delay an acute funding shortfall expected within three to nine months unless new sources are found.</p>
<br><p class="mb-6 italic text-slate-600 my-8">The Foundation’s treasury actions included unstaking 17,000 ETH in late April and another 21,270 ETH in early May 2024.</p>
<p class="mb-6">On paper, Ethereum’s global reach might suggest financial resilience. In practice, however, even large treasuries can be quickly depleted when annual obligations reach tens of millions of dollars.</p> 
<h2 class="text-2xl font-bold mb-4">$30 Million Gap Threatens Key Projects</h2>
<p class="mb-6">In late April and early May, the Ethereum Foundation unstaked a combined 38,270 ETH—worth about $50 million at the time—and sold 10,000 ETH to Bitmine via an over-the-counter deal on May 1. These moves signal increased urgency to shore up liquid reserves amid falling exchange volumes; May saw combined volumes drop by 3.45% to $4.41 trillion, their lowest since September 2024.</p>
<figure class="my-6">
  <img src="/images/charts/1781886756384-ethusd.webp" alt="ETHUSD chart" class="w-full rounded-lg shadow-md" />
  <figcaption class="text-sm text-gray-500 mt-2 text-center">ETHUSD : 24h trend</figcaption>
</figure>
<p class="mb-8 text-lg font-medium">While these treasury actions provide temporary relief, they also highlight how quickly available funds can dwindle if core developer support remains underfunded.</p>
<p class="mb-6">It’s unclear whether the Foundation’s current holdings—approximately 0.16% of all Ether according to Vitalik Buterin—will be sufficient for long-term sustainability without new fundraising mechanisms or partnerships.</p> 
<h2 class="text-2xl font-bold mb-4">Consequences Ripple Beyond Foundation Walls</h2>
<p class="mb-6">The impact of these changes extends beyond internal operations. Dankrad Feist, another prominent figure who recently exited, has publicly advocated for establishing a new organization with at least $1 billion in ETH to "save Ethereum." In March 2024, the Foundation announced a revised mandate focused on decentralization and resilience: its goal is for Ethereum to "pass the walkaway test," ensuring that both protocol and application layers can function independently from any single entity or group of developers.</p>

<div class="tweet-embed my-8 flex justify-center">
    <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-theme="light">
        <a href="https://twitter.com/VitalikButerin/status/2067616044911374428"></a>
    </blockquote>
</div>
<p class="mb-10 max-w-xl">Vitalik Buterin reinforced this stance by emphasizing that the Foundation is not “the center of Ethereum,” but rather just one node among many with a specific mission. Still, morale conceerns linger as veteran contributors continue to step away during this uncertain period.</p> 
<h2 class="text-2xl font-bold mb-4">Why It Matters: Practical Impact on Ethereum’s Future</h2>
<p class="mb-6">For users and developers alike, these challenges could mean slower upgrades and less support for critical infrastructure if funding gaps persist. The price of Ether itself reflects some market anxiety: ETH recently traded at $1,708—down nearly 66% from its all-time high of $4,946 set in August 2025—as reported by decrypt.co.</p>
<p class="mb-6">A shift toward transparency has seen the Foundation stake around 70,000 ETH (about $119 million at current prices) this year. Yet with RWA perpetual futures volumes rising by 10.4% in May alone—a new record—the broader ecosystem continues to evolve rapidly even as its core institution faces turbulence.</p>
<p class="mb-8 text-lg font-medium">Will decentralized governance be enough to weather both leadership attrition and looming financial shortfalls?</p><h2 class="text-2xl font-bold mb-4">Key indicators to follow</h2>
<p class="mb-6">If the Ethereum Foundation fails to secure new funding sources within the next three to nine months, as warned by former contributor Trenton Van Epps, its core development ecosystem could face an immediate shortfall of approximately $30 million in annual funding, though this figure remains unverified.</p>

Leadership Vacuum Deepens at Ethereum Foundation The Ethereum Foundation is facing a wave of high-level departures, with co-executive director Hsiao-Wei Wang announcing her resignation effective immediately after a recent sabbatical.

Ethereum Foundation Exodus Intensifies as Funding Crisis Looms

<h2 class="text-2xl font-bold mb-4">Narrowed Losses Fail to Soothe Investors</h2>
<p class="mb-6">Galaxy Digital's second-quarter earnings report delivered a mixed message to the market on Wednesday. The company posted a net loss of $85 million for the quarter, which was a significant improvement from its $216 million loss in the first quarter of 2026. Despite this progress, investors were not reassured. Galaxy shares dropped sharply in pre-market trading, falling by more than 5% and closing at $20.70—a 6.2% decline—by the opening bell.</p>
<p class="mb-6">On paper, the company managed to reduce its per-share losses to $0.09, down from $0.49 in the previous quarter and beating analyst expectations of a $0.28 loss per share. Yet, this beat failed to spark optimism among shareholders, who seemed more focused on broader revenue shortfalls and persistent market headwinds.</p>
<p class="mb-10 max-w-xl">The stock's slide underlines persistent skepticism about Galaxy’s ability to weather ongoing volatility in digital asset markets.</p> 
<h2 class="text-2xl font-bold mb-4">Revenue Misses Analyst Forecasts</h2>
<p class="mb-6">Galaxy reported revenue of $8.7 billion for the quarter, representing a 15% drop from the $10.2 billion recorded in Q1 2026. This figure also fell well short of Wall Street’s consensus estimate of $12.7 billion for the period, according to Yahoo Finance data cited by cointelegraph.com. The miss came as digital asset prices declined sharply across the industry; total crypto market capitalization slid nearly 15% over the quarter, landing at $2 trillion on June 30 after starting April at $2.35 trillion.</p>
<br><p class="mb-6 italic text-slate-600 my-8">Total crypto market capitalization dropped by $350 billion between April 1 and June 30, 2026.</p>
<p class="mb-6">Despite these challenges, Galaxy’s digital assets operation generated an adjusted gross profit of $66 million—up 34% quarter-over-quarter—even as trading volumes slipped by 7%. The contrast between improved profitability and shrinking top-line revenue highlights both operational resilience and ongoing exposure to sector-wide downturns.</p>

<div class="tweet-embed my-8 flex justify-center">
    <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-theme="light">
        <a href="https://twitter.com/LarkDavis/status/2084867091182580212"></a>
    </blockquote>
</div>
<p class="mb-8 text-lg font-medium">It’s unclear whether this operational uptick can offset macroeconomic pressures in coming quarters.</p> 
<h2 class="text-2xl font-bold mb-4">Data Center Debut Boosts Margins</h2>
<p class="mb-6">The second quarter marked a milestone for Galaxy’s AI data center business, with its Helios campus in West Texas generating revenue for the first time since inception. This new segment contributed an adjusted gross profit of $20 million and adjusted EBITDA of $11 million—reversing a previous quarter’s adjusted EBITDA loss of $900,000.</p>
<p class="mb-6">The company delivered 200 megawatts of gross power (133 megawatts critical IT capacity) to CoreWeave under a long-term lease agreement. Looking ahead, Galaxy expects roughly $80 million in quarterly leasing revenue from Helios Phase I starting in Q3 and projects annual revenues of up to $1 billion from its CoreWeave partnership over the next fifteen years.</p> 
<h2 class="text-2xl font-bold mb-4">AI Pivot Can't Offset Crypto Slump</h2>
<p class="mb-6">While the AI data center initiative has started to deliver tangible profits, it has not been enough to counteract losses stemming from digital asset price depreciation during Q2. The company’s trading volume contracted by 7%, reflecting broader market malaise as crypto prices fell sharply across major tokens during the period.</p>
<p class="mb-6">In addition, despite stronger margins from new business lines, overall sentiment remains cautious due to Galaxy’s heavy reliance on volatile crypto markets for core revenues.</p> 
<h2 class="text-2xl font-bold mb-4">Debt Load Swells After $3.5B Raise</h2>
<p class="mb-6">Galaxy Digital closed a substantial private offering late in July through its subsidiary Galaxy Helios Data Centers II LLC, raising $3.5 billion in senior secured notes due 2031. This move pushed total company debt above the $6 billion mark—a level that may raise concerns about leverage if earnings growth does not accelerate as planned.</p>
<p class="mb-8 text-lg font-medium">For now, investors are left weighing short-term pain against long-term bets on AI infrastructure and digital asset recovery.</p><h2 class="text-2xl font-bold mb-4">Next potential catalysts</h2>
<p class="mb-6">If Galaxy's Helios Phase I campus delivers the expected $80 million in quarterly leasing revenue beginning in Q3, immediate attention will focus on whether this new income stream offsets recent losses and impacts share performance following the 12% post-Q2 decline; confirmation of these revenues remains pending until the next quarterly report.</p>

Narrowed Losses Fail to Soothe Investors Galaxy Digital's second-quarter earnings report delivered a mixed message to the market on Wednesday.

Galaxy Digital Shares Sink as Q2 Losses Persist and AI Data Center Debut Fails to Impress

<h2 class="text-2xl font-bold mb-4">Circle Beats on Profit, Misses Revenue</h2>
<p class="mb-6">Circle Internet’s second-quarter results delivered a mixed message to investors. The company posted adjusted earnings of 18 cents per share, surpassing analysts’ consensus estimate of 16 cents. Net income from continuing operations reached $48 million, outpacing the projected $43 million and marking a sharp year-on-year increase of $530 million. However, revenue for the quarter came in at $701 million, falling short of Wall Street’s average expectation of $713.32 million. Adjusted EBITDA also improved by 8% to $143 million, but the revenue miss overshadowed these gains in the eyes of many market watchers.</p>
<p class="mb-10 max-w-xl">On Wednesday morning, Circle shares initially rose 5.7% in pre-market trading to above $66.50, but the stock remains down roughly 20% for the year—underscoring persistent investor skepticism despite solid profit metrics.</p>
<h2 class="text-2xl font-bold mb-4">USDC Circulation Up, Stock Slides</h2>
<p class="mb-6">USDC, Circle’s flagship stablecoin pegged 1:1 to the U.S. dollar, saw its circulation reach $73.3 billion at the end of June—a 19% increase from a year earlier. This growth was accompanied by a surge in onchain transaction volume for USDC, which jumped 151% to $14.8 trillion during the quarter.<br><p class="mb-6 italic text-slate-600 my-8">USDC circulation, while up from last June, remains below its 2026 peak of nearly $80 billion.</p>Yet these robust usage figures were not enough to buoy Circle’s share price in the wake of its earnings release.</p>
<p class="mb-6">On paper, USDC’s rising adoption signals strong underlying demand; but Circle’s shares still fell about 3% in premarket trading after earnings hit the wire. The disconnect points to broader market concerns about competition and future revenue streams.</p>

<div class="tweet-embed my-8 flex justify-center">
    <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-theme="light">
        <a href="https://twitter.com/LarkDavis/status/2084813712792183022"></a>
    </blockquote>
</div>
<p class="mb-8 text-lg font-medium">It’s unclear if sustained USDC growth alone will be sufficient to reverse the stock’s downward trend.</p>
<h2 class="text-2xl font-bold mb-4">Open USD Sends Shares Tumbling</h2>
<p class="mb-6">The recent launch of Open USD (OUSD), an open-source stablecoin standard backed by over 140 partners—including heavyweights like Coinbase, Visa, and Mastercard—added another layer of uncertainty for Circle investors. The announcement triggered a sharp selloff that wiped billions off Circle’s market value and sent shares tumbling as much as 20%. While OUSD is not positioned as a direct replacement for USDC, its high-profile support has raised questions about stablecoin market share.</p>
<p class="mb-10 max-w-xl">Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong emphasized that his company is a “multi-stablecoin platform,” supporting not only USDC but also competitors like Tether’s USDT and PayPal’s PYUSD; he described Open USD as creating new business opportunities rather than replacing existing coins.</p>
<h2 class="text-2xl font-bold mb-4">Big Backers Stick With USDC</h2>
<p class="mb-6">Despite market jitters around Open USD, several major backers have reaffirmed their commitment to USDC and Circle’s ecosystem. Coinbase CFO Alesia Haas confirmed during the Q2 call that Coinbase has renewed its commercial agreement with Circle and plans to continue growing USDC adoption. Meanwhile, Mastercard CEO Michael Miebach stated that Mastercard will enable Open USD across its network but continues to support other stablecoins including USDC and Paxos-led USDG.</p>
<p class="mb-6">Visa CEO Ryan McInerney echoed this multi-stablecoin approach, highlighting Visa’s role in connecting clients to whichever stablecoins gain traction. Visa recently launched its own Stablecoin Platform with OUSD as an initial supported token but maintains ongoing support for USDC transactions as well.</p>
<h2 class="text-2xl font-bold mb-4">Onchain Volume Surges Amid Market Jitters</h2>
<p class="mb-6">Circle’s blockchain ambitions are gaining momentum even as competitive pressures mount. The public mainnet launch for Arc—the company’s new blockchain designed for regulated finance—is slated for September 16. BlackRock, DTCC, Galaxy Digital, ICE, Mastercard, MoneyGram, SBI Group, Standard Chartered, Sumitomo Corporation, and Visa have all signed on as founding validators for Arc.</p>
<p class="mb-6">Reserve income for Q2 climbed 5% year-on-year to $668 million on the back of a 25% increase in average USDC circulation. Looking ahead, Circle has raised its full-year guidance for “other revenue” (which includes Arc token presale proceeds) from a prior range of $150–$170 million up to $310–$330 million—a significant upward revision reflecting expectations around new product launches.</p>
<p class="mb-8 text-lg font-medium">According to cointelegraph.com, net income from continuing operations surged by $530 million compared with last year—a rare bright spot amid otherwise turbulent trading conditions.</p><h2 class="text-2xl font-bold mb-4">What remains unresolved</h2>
<p class="mb-6">If the public mainnet launch of Circle’s Arc blockchain, scheduled for September 16 with validators including BlackRock, DTCC, and Visa, proceeds as planned, immediate market reaction will hinge on whether this event drives a reversal in Circle’s year-to-date 20% share price decline and impacts USDC circulation, which stood at $73.3 billion at the end of June; the extent of this effect remains unclear.</p>

Circle Beats on Profit, Misses Revenue Circle Internet’s second-quarter results delivered a mixed message to investors. The company posted adjusted earnings of 18 cents per share, surpassing analysts’ consensus estimate of 16 cents.

Latest news on Regulations

Stablecoins, Storms, and Stalled Bills: Crypto Regulation Faces New Headwinds