Hyperliquid vs Mantle: Key Differences (HYPE vs MNT)
Complete side-by-side comparison of Hyperliquid and Mantle. Price, market cap, technology, and more.
Share Hyperliquid vs Mantle
What is Hyperliquid?
null (HYPE) is a cryptocurrency with limited available information regarding its consensus mechanism, use case, or founding details. It stands out due to the lack of typical data points commonly found in crypto projects.
What is Mantle?
Mantle is an EVM-compatible Layer 2 backed by BitDAO's massive treasury. It focuses on modular architecture and developer experience. The token launched with aggressive ecosystem incentives to attract projects and liquidity. Success depends on building a competitive DeFi ecosystem.
Price Evolution
Percentage change from start of period
Detailed Comparison
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Price & Market | ||
| Price | $57.87 | $0.54 |
Price $57.87 $0.54 | ||
| Market Cap | $12.87B | $1.78B |
Market Cap $12.87B $1.78B | ||
| 24h Volume | $958.43M | $20.27M |
24h Volume $958.43M $20.27M | ||
| Volume/Cap Ratio | 7.45% | 1.14% |
Volume/Cap Ratio 7.45% 1.14% | ||
| Market Dominance | 0.00610824% | 0.00084598% |
Market Dominance 0.00610824% 0.00084598% | ||
| All-Time High | $75.48 | $2.86 |
All-Time High $75.48 $2.86 | ||
| ATH Date | Jun 2, 2026 | Oct 9, 2025 |
ATH Date Jun 2, 2026 Oct 9, 2025 | ||
| Performance | ||
| 24h Change | 5.20% | 1.11% |
24h Change 5.20% 1.11% | ||
| 7d Change | 15.68% | 3.86% |
7d Change 15.68% 3.86% | ||
| 30d Change | 44.77% | 18.74% |
30d Change 44.77% 18.74% | ||
| Supply | ||
| Circulating Supply | 222.45M | 3.30B |
Circulating Supply 222.45M 3.30B | ||
| Total Supply | 955.31M | 6.22B |
Total Supply 955.31M 6.22B | ||
| Max Supply | 1.00B | 6.22B |
Max Supply 1.00B 6.22B | ||
| Technology | ||
| Consensus | N/A | Optimistic Rollup |
Consensus N/A Optimistic Rollup | ||
| Block Time | N/A | 2 seconds |
Block Time N/A 2 seconds | ||
| TPS (Transactions/sec) | N/A | 500 |
TPS (Transactions/sec) N/A 500 | ||
| Launch Year | N/A | 2023 |
Launch Year N/A 2023 | ||
| Transaction Fees | ||
| Average Fee | < $0.01 | $0.001-$0.10 |
Average Fee < $0.01 $0.001-$0.10 | ||
| Fee Model | Hyperliquid L1, low gas fees | Mantle L2, low gas fees |
Fee Model Hyperliquid L1, low gas fees Mantle L2, low gas fees | ||
| General | ||
| Primary Use Case | N/A | Ethereum L2, DeFi, Gaming |
Primary Use Case N/A Ethereum L2, DeFi, Gaming | ||
| Founder | N/A | BitDAO community |
Founder N/A BitDAO community | ||
| Website | N/A | mantle.xyz |
Website N/A | ||
| Volatility & Risk | ||
| Drawdown from ATH | 23.3% | 81.1% |
Drawdown from ATH 23.3% 81.1% | ||
- ✓Lack of information could mean early investment opportunity
- ✓Potential for high volatility may offer trading profits
- ✓Absence of consensus mechanism details may allow flexibility
- ✓Backed by BitDAO's large treasury, ensuring strong financial support
- ✓EVM-compatible Layer 2, facilitating easy Ethereum integration
- ✓Aggressive ecosystem incentives to attract projects and liquidity
Hyperliquid Risks
- ✗No available data on use case limits fundamental analysis
- ✗Unknown founder and launch year increase risk profile
- ✗Lack of transparency may deter institutional investors
Mantle Risks
- ✗Success depends heavily on building a competitive DeFi ecosystem
- ✗Uses optimistic rollup, which can have slower finality than alternatives
- ✗Launched recently in 2023, with limited long-term track record
The Verdict
Both Hyperliquid and Mantle serve important roles in the crypto ecosystem. Many investors choose to hold both as part of a diversified crypto portfolio.
Latest Articles about Hyperliquid
Share Hyperliquid vs Mantle