Uniswap vs Near Protocol: Key Differences (UNI vs NEAR)
Complete side-by-side comparison of Uniswap and Near Protocol. Price, market cap, technology, and more.
Share Uniswap vs Near Protocol
What is Uniswap?
Uniswap invented the automated market maker and changed crypto trading forever. No order books, no KYC, just liquidity pools and math. Hayden Adams built the first version with an Ethereum Foundation grant. Now it processes more volume than most centralized exchanges.
What is Near Protocol?
NEAR Protocol uses sharding (Nightshade) to achieve high throughput while keeping the network decentralized. Human-readable account names and simple onboarding make it developer and user friendly. The team includes former Google and Facebook engineers.
Price Evolution
Percentage change from start of period
UNI+10.30%NEAR+5.40%Detailed Comparison
| Metric | UNI | NEAR |
|---|---|---|
| UNI NEAR | ||
| Price & Market | ||
| Price | $4.33 | $1.89 |
Price $4.33 $1.89 | ||
| Market Cap | $2.70B | $2.46B |
Market Cap $2.70B $2.46B | ||
| 24h Volume | $310.95M | $279.56M |
24h Volume $310.95M $279.56M | ||
| Volume/Cap Ratio | 11.53% | 11.35% |
Volume/Cap Ratio 11.53% 11.35% | ||
| Market Dominance | 0.00103628% | 0.0009472% |
Market Dominance 0.00103628% 0.0009472% | ||
| All-Time High | $44.92 | $20.44 |
All-Time High $44.92 $20.44 | ||
| ATH Date | May 2, 2021 | Jan 16, 2022 |
ATH Date May 2, 2021 Jan 16, 2022 | ||
| Performance | ||
| 24h Change | 0.96% | 3.53% |
24h Change 0.96% 3.53% | ||
| 7d Change | 32.70% | 16.30% |
7d Change 32.70% 16.30% | ||
| 30d Change | 10.30% | 5.40% |
30d Change 10.30% 5.40% | ||
| Supply | ||
| Circulating Supply | 623.28M | 1.30B |
Circulating Supply 623.28M 1.30B | ||
| Total Supply | 890.53M | 1.30B |
Total Supply 890.53M 1.30B | ||
| Max Supply | 1.00B | Unlimited |
Max Supply 1.00B Unlimited | ||
| Technology | ||
| Consensus | ERC-20 (Ethereum PoS) | Nightshade (Sharded PoS) |
Consensus ERC-20 (Ethereum PoS) Nightshade (Sharded PoS) | ||
| Block Time | N/A (Token) | 1 second |
Block Time N/A (Token) 1 second | ||
| TPS (Transactions/sec) | N/A | 100000 |
TPS (Transactions/sec) N/A 100000 | ||
| Launch Year | 2018 | 2020 |
Launch Year 2018 2020 | ||
| Transaction Fees | ||
| Average Fee | $0.50-$20 | < $0.01 |
Average Fee $0.50-$20 < $0.01 | ||
| Fee Model | Ethereum gas fees (ERC-20) | Near sharding, low gas fees |
Fee Model Ethereum gas fees (ERC-20) Near sharding, low gas fees | ||
| General | ||
| Primary Use Case | DEX governance, DeFi | Scalable dApps, AI, Developer platform |
Primary Use Case DEX governance, DeFi Scalable dApps, AI, Developer platform | ||
| Founder | Hayden Adams | Illia Polosukhin, Alexander Skidanov |
Founder Hayden Adams Illia Polosukhin, Alexander Skidanov | ||
| Website | uniswap.org | near.org |
Website | ||
| Volatility & Risk | ||
| Drawdown from ATH | 90.4% | 90.8% |
Drawdown from ATH 90.4% 90.8% | ||
Why Uniswap?- ✓Pioneer and leader of decentralized exchanges
- ✓Massive trading volume - often exceeds centralized exchanges
- ✓Deployed on all major chains (Ethereum, Arbitrum, Polygon...)
Why Near Protocol?- ✓Uses sharding (Nightshade) for high throughput and scalability
- ✓Developer-friendly with human-readable account names and easy onboarding
- ✓Founders have strong tech backgrounds from Google and Facebook
Uniswap Risks
- ✗Token utility limited - no fee sharing yet
- ✗Faces increasing competition from aggregators
Near Protocol Risks
- ✗Relatively young network launched in 2020 with less proven longevity
- ✗Faces strong competition from other scalable smart contract platforms
- ✗Sharding complexity may pose security and maintenance challenges
The Verdict
Both Uniswap and Near Protocol serve important roles in the crypto ecosystem. Uniswap focuses on dex governance, defi, while Near Protocol is known for scalable dapps, ai, developer platform. Many investors choose to hold both as part of a diversified crypto portfolio.
Share Uniswap vs Near Protocol
