Near Protocol vs Uniswap: Key Differences (NEAR vs UNI)
Complete side-by-side comparison of Near Protocol and Uniswap. Price, market cap, technology, and more.
Share Near Protocol vs Uniswap
What is Near Protocol?
NEAR Protocol uses sharding (Nightshade) to achieve high throughput while keeping the network decentralized. Human-readable account names and simple onboarding make it developer and user friendly. The team includes former Google and Facebook engineers.
What is Uniswap?
Uniswap invented the automated market maker and changed crypto trading forever. No order books, no KYC, just liquidity pools and math. Hayden Adams built the first version with an Ethereum Foundation grant. Now it processes more volume than most centralized exchanges.
Price Evolution
Percentage change from start of period
NEAR+0.10%UNI+34.00%Detailed Comparison
| Metric | NEAR | UNI |
|---|---|---|
| NEAR UNI | ||
| Price & Market | ||
| Price | $1.8 | $3.9 |
Price $1.8 $3.9 | ||
| Market Cap | $2.34B | $2.44B |
Market Cap $2.34B $2.44B | ||
| 24h Volume | $68.06M | $130.73M |
24h Volume $68.06M $130.73M | ||
| Volume/Cap Ratio | 2.91% | 5.37% |
Volume/Cap Ratio 2.91% 5.37% | ||
| Market Dominance | 0.00108815% | 0.00113323% |
Market Dominance 0.00108815% 0.00113323% | ||
| All-Time High | $20.44 | $44.92 |
All-Time High $20.44 $44.92 | ||
| ATH Date | Jan 16, 2022 | May 2, 2021 |
ATH Date Jan 16, 2022 May 2, 2021 | ||
| Performance | ||
| 24h Change | 0.70% | 4.90% |
24h Change 0.70% 4.90% | ||
| 7d Change | 6.60% | 8.80% |
7d Change 6.60% 8.80% | ||
| 30d Change | 0.10% | 34.00% |
30d Change 0.10% 34.00% | ||
| Supply | ||
| Circulating Supply | 1.30B | 625.18M |
Circulating Supply 1.30B 625.18M | ||
| Total Supply | 1.30B | 892.32M |
Total Supply 1.30B 892.32M | ||
| Max Supply | Unlimited | 1.00B |
Max Supply Unlimited 1.00B | ||
| Technology | ||
| Consensus | Nightshade (Sharded PoS) | ERC-20 (Ethereum PoS) |
Consensus Nightshade (Sharded PoS) ERC-20 (Ethereum PoS) | ||
| Block Time | 1 second | N/A (Token) |
Block Time 1 second N/A (Token) | ||
| TPS (Transactions/sec) | 100000 | N/A |
TPS (Transactions/sec) 100000 N/A | ||
| Launch Year | 2020 | 2018 |
Launch Year 2020 2018 | ||
| Transaction Fees | ||
| Average Fee | < $0.01 | $0.50-$20 |
Average Fee < $0.01 $0.50-$20 | ||
| Fee Model | Near sharding, low gas fees | Ethereum gas fees (ERC-20) |
Fee Model Near sharding, low gas fees Ethereum gas fees (ERC-20) | ||
| General | ||
| Primary Use Case | Scalable dApps, AI, Developer platform | DEX governance, DeFi |
Primary Use Case Scalable dApps, AI, Developer platform DEX governance, DeFi | ||
| Founder | Illia Polosukhin, Alexander Skidanov | Hayden Adams |
Founder Illia Polosukhin, Alexander Skidanov Hayden Adams | ||
| Website | near.org | uniswap.org |
Website | ||
| Volatility & Risk | ||
| Drawdown from ATH | 91.2% | 91.3% |
Drawdown from ATH 91.2% 91.3% | ||
Why Near Protocol?- ✓Uses sharding (Nightshade) for high throughput and scalability
- ✓Developer-friendly with human-readable account names and easy onboarding
- ✓Founders have strong tech backgrounds from Google and Facebook
Why Uniswap?- ✓Pioneer and leader of decentralized exchanges
- ✓Massive trading volume - often exceeds centralized exchanges
- ✓Deployed on all major chains (Ethereum, Arbitrum, Polygon...)
Near Protocol Risks
- ✗Relatively young network launched in 2020 with less proven longevity
- ✗Faces strong competition from other scalable smart contract platforms
- ✗Sharding complexity may pose security and maintenance challenges
Uniswap Risks
- ✗Token utility limited - no fee sharing yet
- ✗Faces increasing competition from aggregators
The Verdict
Both Near Protocol and Uniswap serve important roles in the crypto ecosystem. Near Protocol focuses on scalable dapps, ai, developer platform, while Uniswap is known for dex governance, defi. Many investors choose to hold both as part of a diversified crypto portfolio.
Share Near Protocol vs Uniswap
