Near Protocol vs Aster: Key Differences (NEAR vs ASTER)
Complete side-by-side comparison of Near Protocol and Aster. Price, market cap, technology, and more.
Share Near Protocol vs Aster
What is Near Protocol?
NEAR Protocol uses sharding (Nightshade) to achieve high throughput while keeping the network decentralized. Human-readable account names and simple onboarding make it developer and user friendly. The team includes former Google and Facebook engineers.
What is Aster?
ASTER is a cryptocurrency project with limited public information available, lacking details on consensus mechanism, use case, launch year, or founder. Its unique aspects are currently undefined due to scarce data.
Price Evolution
Percentage change from start of period
NEAR-18.06%ASTER-12.76%Detailed Comparison
| Metric | NEAR | ASTER |
|---|---|---|
| NEAR ASTER | ||
| Price & Market | ||
| Price | $1.95 | $0.629 |
Price $1.95 $0.629 | ||
| Market Cap | $2.53B | $1.68B |
Market Cap $2.53B $1.68B | ||
| 24h Volume | $182.24M | $88.75M |
24h Volume $182.24M $88.75M | ||
| Volume/Cap Ratio | 7.19% | 5.27% |
Volume/Cap Ratio 7.19% 5.27% | ||
| Market Dominance | 0.00121651% | 0.14151835% |
Market Dominance 0.00121651% 0.14151835% | ||
| All-Time High | $20.44 | $2.41 |
All-Time High $20.44 $2.41 | ||
| ATH Date | Jan 16, 2022 | Sep 24, 2025 |
ATH Date Jan 16, 2022 Sep 24, 2025 | ||
| Performance | ||
| 24h Change | 1.85% | 1.87% |
24h Change 1.85% 1.87% | ||
| 7d Change | 14.18% | 5.17% |
7d Change 14.18% 5.17% | ||
| 30d Change | 18.06% | 12.76% |
30d Change 18.06% 12.76% | ||
| Supply | ||
| Circulating Supply | 1.30B | 2.68B |
Circulating Supply 1.30B 2.68B | ||
| Total Supply | 1.30B | 7.82B |
Total Supply 1.30B 7.82B | ||
| Max Supply | Unlimited | 8.00B |
Max Supply Unlimited 8.00B | ||
| Technology | ||
| Consensus | Nightshade (Sharded PoS) | N/A |
Consensus Nightshade (Sharded PoS) N/A | ||
| Block Time | 1 second | N/A |
Block Time 1 second N/A | ||
| TPS (Transactions/sec) | 100000 | N/A |
TPS (Transactions/sec) 100000 N/A | ||
| Launch Year | 2020 | N/A |
Launch Year 2020 N/A | ||
| Transaction Fees | ||
| Average Fee | < $0.01 | $0.50-$20 |
Average Fee < $0.01 $0.50-$20 | ||
| Fee Model | Near sharding, low gas fees | Ethereum gas fees (ERC-20) |
Fee Model Near sharding, low gas fees Ethereum gas fees (ERC-20) | ||
| General | ||
| Primary Use Case | Scalable dApps, AI, Developer platform | N/A |
Primary Use Case Scalable dApps, AI, Developer platform N/A | ||
| Founder | Illia Polosukhin, Alexander Skidanov | N/A |
Founder Illia Polosukhin, Alexander Skidanov N/A | ||
| Website | near.org | N/A |
Website N/A | ||
| Volatility & Risk | ||
| Drawdown from ATH | 90.5% | 73.9% |
Drawdown from ATH 90.5% 73.9% | ||
Why Near Protocol?- ✓Uses sharding (Nightshade) for high throughput and scalability
- ✓Developer-friendly with human-readable account names and easy onboarding
- ✓Founders have strong tech backgrounds from Google and Facebook
Why Aster?- ✓Potential for innovation due to lack of existing constraints
- ✓Opportunity to define unique consensus mechanisms
- ✓Flexibility in use case development from a blank slate
Near Protocol Risks
- ✗Relatively young network launched in 2020 with less proven longevity
- ✗Faces strong competition from other scalable smart contract platforms
- ✗Sharding complexity may pose security and maintenance challenges
Aster Risks
- ✗No available data on fundamentals or technology
- ✗High risk due to lack of transparency and information
- ✗Difficult to assess market potential without use case
The Verdict
Both Near Protocol and Aster serve important roles in the crypto ecosystem. Many investors choose to hold both as part of a diversified crypto portfolio.
Latest Articles about Aster
Share Near Protocol vs Aster
