Chainlink vs Near Protocol: Key Differences (LINK vs NEAR)
Complete side-by-side comparison of Chainlink and Near Protocol. Price, market cap, technology, and more.
Share Chainlink vs Near Protocol
What is Chainlink?
Chainlink solved a fundamental problem: how do smart contracts get real-world data? Price feeds, weather data, sports scores - Chainlink oracles bring it all on-chain securely. It's the infrastructure layer that most of DeFi quietly depends on. Not flashy, but absolutely essential.
What is Near Protocol?
NEAR Protocol uses sharding (Nightshade) to achieve high throughput while keeping the network decentralized. Human-readable account names and simple onboarding make it developer and user friendly. The team includes former Google and Facebook engineers.
Price Evolution
Percentage change from start of period
Detailed Comparison
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Price & Market | ||
| Price | $7.9 | $2.06 |
Price $7.9 $2.06 | ||
| Market Cap | $5.74B | $2.67B |
Market Cap $5.74B $2.67B | ||
| 24h Volume | $289.35M | $484.53M |
24h Volume $289.35M $484.53M | ||
| Volume/Cap Ratio | 5.04% | 18.15% |
Volume/Cap Ratio 5.04% 18.15% | ||
| Market Dominance | 0.00272468% | 0.00126705% |
Market Dominance 0.00272468% 0.00126705% | ||
| All-Time High | $52.7 | $20.44 |
All-Time High $52.7 $20.44 | ||
| ATH Date | May 10, 2021 | Jan 16, 2022 |
ATH Date May 10, 2021 Jan 16, 2022 | ||
| Performance | ||
| 24h Change | 3.21% | 1.28% |
24h Change 3.21% 1.28% | ||
| 7d Change | 1.87% | 15.53% |
7d Change 1.87% 15.53% | ||
| 30d Change | 22.12% | 29.72% |
30d Change 22.12% 29.72% | ||
| Supply | ||
| Circulating Supply | 727.10M | 1.30B |
Circulating Supply 727.10M 1.30B | ||
| Total Supply | 1.00B | 1.30B |
Total Supply 1.00B 1.30B | ||
| Max Supply | 1.00B | Unlimited |
Max Supply 1.00B Unlimited | ||
| Technology | ||
| Consensus | Decentralized Oracle Network | Nightshade (Sharded PoS) |
Consensus Decentralized Oracle Network Nightshade (Sharded PoS) | ||
| Block Time | N/A (Oracle) | 1 second |
Block Time N/A (Oracle) 1 second | ||
| TPS (Transactions/sec) | N/A | 100000 |
TPS (Transactions/sec) N/A 100000 | ||
| Launch Year | 2017 | 2020 |
Launch Year 2017 2020 | ||
| Transaction Fees | ||
| Average Fee | $0.50-$20 | < $0.01 |
Average Fee $0.50-$20 < $0.01 | ||
| Fee Model | Ethereum gas fees (ERC-20) | Near sharding, low gas fees |
Fee Model Ethereum gas fees (ERC-20) Near sharding, low gas fees | ||
| General | ||
| Primary Use Case | Oracles, Data feeds, Cross-chain | Scalable dApps, AI, Developer platform |
Primary Use Case Oracles, Data feeds, Cross-chain Scalable dApps, AI, Developer platform | ||
| Founder | Sergey Nazarov | Illia Polosukhin, Alexander Skidanov |
Founder Sergey Nazarov Illia Polosukhin, Alexander Skidanov | ||
| Website | chain.link | near.org |
Website | ||
| Volatility & Risk | ||
| Drawdown from ATH | 85.0% | 89.9% |
Drawdown from ATH 85.0% 89.9% | ||
- ✓Powers price feeds for most major DeFi protocols
- ✓Expanding into cross-chain messaging (CCIP)
- ✓Battle-tested infrastructure with minimal failures
- ✓Uses sharding (Nightshade) for high throughput and scalability
- ✓Developer-friendly with human-readable account names and easy onboarding
- ✓Founders have strong tech backgrounds from Google and Facebook
Chainlink Risks
- ✗Token utility mainly limited to staking and payments
- ✗Large token supply held by team
Near Protocol Risks
- ✗Relatively young network launched in 2020 with less proven longevity
- ✗Faces strong competition from other scalable smart contract platforms
- ✗Sharding complexity may pose security and maintenance challenges
The Verdict
Both Chainlink and Near Protocol serve important roles in the crypto ecosystem. Chainlink focuses on oracles, data feeds, cross-chain, while Near Protocol is known for scalable dapps, ai, developer platform. Many investors choose to hold both as part of a diversified crypto portfolio.
Latest Articles about Chainlink
Share Chainlink vs Near Protocol