Clarity Act Finalizes Stablecoin Yield Rules, Redrawing Crypto Reward Boundaries

Stylized stablecoins and yield icons overlay blockchain graphics with rising financial charts on a tech gradient background

Stablecoin Yield Offers Face New Limits

After months of negotiation, the U.S. Senate has published the final text of the Clarity Act’s stablecoin yield provisions, settling a core regulatory dispute for the crypto sector. The compromise, hammered out by Senators Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) and Angela Alsobrooks (D-Md.), prohibits stablecoin issuers from paying any form of interest or yield—whether in cash, tokens, or other consideration—solely for holding payment stablecoins. This means that customers will no longer be able to earn passive rewards simply by parking their dollars in digital tokens like USDC or USDT.

The restriction is explicit: it covers yield paid to any “restricted recipient” in a manner equivalent to interest-bearing bank deposits. On paper, this levels the playing field for traditional banks, but it also narrows one of crypto’s most popular incentives. According to cointelegraph.com, this yield ban was one of the main roadblocks delaying the Clarity Act’s progress through Congress.


The Senate released the compromise text on Friday, following negotiations between Senators Thom Tillis and Angela Alsobrooks.

Activity-Based Rewards Survive Senate Compromise

While the law clamps down on reserve-based yields, it leaves room for crypto firms to offer rewards linked to “bona fide activities” or real participation on their platforms. Examples include transaction-based perks similar to credit card cashback programs. Coinbase chief legal officer Paul Grewal noted that this preserves incentives tied to genuine usage rather than passive holding.

Loyalty programs that mimic deposit interest are still off-limits under the new language.

The text directs the Treasury Department and Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) to launch a rulemaking process within a year after the bill becomes law, aiming to clarify which activities qualify for permitted rewards. This timeline means further regulatory guidance could arrive as soon as 2025 if the bill passes in its current form.

Industry Reacts to Reserve Yield Ban

Market participants have already started adjusting expectations. On Polymarket, a popular crypto prediction platform, traders now assign a 55% probability that the Clarity Act will be signed into law by 2026—a 9% increase over just 24 hours following release of the final text. This jump reflects growing confidence that lawmakers will resolve key sticking points and push regulatory clarity forward.

The debate over stablecoin yields had been a central obstacle for months. For context: The GENIUS Act previously provided a federal framework for payment stablecoins in the U.S., with implementation responsibilities split among Treasury, OCC, and FDIC. However, with new restrictions on yield and fresh anti-evasion language included in the Clarity Act’s compromise section, regulators are signaling they intend to draw sharper lines around what constitutes an acceptable reward.

Galaxy Digital’s head of research Alex Thorn highlighted that Senate Banking may move quickly to mark up the bill as soon as the week of May 11—a sign that legislative momentum is building after prolonged deadlock.

Banks Shielded From Stablecoin Competition

By banning yield payments based purely on holding reserves, lawmakers are explicitly shielding traditional banks from direct competition with stablecoin issuers offering pseudo-deposit products. The restriction applies not only to cash but also to token-based and non-cash forms of consideration—closing common workarounds used by some crypto firms in recent years.

This approach mirrors recent moves by federal regulators: The FDIC’s April proposal covers insured depository institutions and stablecoin issuers alike, setting requirements for reserves, redemption rights, capital adequacy, and risk management. Under these rules, the GENIUS Act will take effect on January 18, 2027 or 120 days after final implementing rules are issued—whichever comes first—giving banks and fintechs time to adapt business models before enforcement begins.

Uncertainty Lingers on Approved Incentives

Despite clearer boundaries around reserve-based yields versus activity-linked rewards, uncertainty remains about how U.S. regulators will ultimately define “bona fide activities.” The law mandates rulemaking within one year of passage but leaves many details open until Treasury and CFTC weigh in. Some industry voices warn that without specific examples or safe harbors, crypto firms may hesitate to launch new incentive programs until further guidance emerges.

Meanwhile, Bitcoin continues its upward trajectory amid regulatory developments: On Saturday during Asian trading hours, it traded at $78,180—up 0.8% on the week after rebounding from Wednesday’s low near $75,500. Broader markets also showed resilience; the S&P 500 closed Friday at an all-time high after gaining 0.3%, marking its fifth consecutive weekly advance.

Main Takeaways

  • The Clarity Act bans stablecoin issuers from paying any yield solely for holding stablecoins, per final text released May 3, 2024.
  • Activity-based rewards, such as transaction perks, remain allowed; loyalty programs mimicking deposit interest are explicitly prohibited.
  • Treasury and CFTC must begin rulemaking within 1 year of the bill becoming law to clarify permitted stablecoin rewards.

What to monitor next

If the Senate Banking Committee schedules a markup for the Clarity Act as soon as the week of May 11, as suggested by Alex Thorn, immediate attention will turn to whether the committee advances the bill, which would signal the next step toward resolving the stablecoin yield restrictions finalized in the compromise text; however, the exact markup date remains unconfirmed.